YES 0.637 H-Termination proof of /home/matraf/haskell/eval_FullyBlown_Fast/empty.hs
H-Termination of the given Haskell-Program with start terms could successfully be proven:



HASKELL
  ↳ BR

mainModule Main
  ((zipWith3 :: (b  ->  a  ->  d  ->  c ->  [b ->  [a ->  [d ->  [c]) :: (b  ->  a  ->  d  ->  c ->  [b ->  [a ->  [d ->  [c])

module Main where
  import qualified Prelude



Replaced joker patterns by fresh variables and removed binding patterns.

↳ HASKELL
  ↳ BR
HASKELL
      ↳ COR

mainModule Main
  ((zipWith3 :: (d  ->  c  ->  a  ->  b ->  [d ->  [c ->  [a ->  [b]) :: (d  ->  c  ->  a  ->  b ->  [d ->  [c ->  [a ->  [b])

module Main where
  import qualified Prelude



Cond Reductions:
The following Function with conditions
undefined 
 | False
 = undefined

is transformed to
undefined  = undefined1

undefined0 True = undefined

undefined1  = undefined0 False



↳ HASKELL
  ↳ BR
    ↳ HASKELL
      ↳ COR
HASKELL
          ↳ Narrow

mainModule Main
  (zipWith3 :: (c  ->  a  ->  d  ->  b ->  [c ->  [a ->  [d ->  [b])

module Main where
  import qualified Prelude



Haskell To QDPs


↳ HASKELL
  ↳ BR
    ↳ HASKELL
      ↳ COR
        ↳ HASKELL
          ↳ Narrow
QDP
              ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

new_zipWith3(wv3, :(wv40, wv41), :(wv50, wv51), :(wv60, wv61), ba, bb, bc, bd) → new_zipWith3(wv3, wv41, wv51, wv61, ba, bb, bc, bd)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs: